ILM by City & Guilds · 8723-306Mandatory unit

Unit 306: Developing project management skills

This unit equips learners with the knowledge and skills needed to support the planning, delivery, and monitoring of workplace projects. Learners will explore the project lifecycle, team roles, tools and techniques, and approaches to managing resources, risks, and quality.

In short

Unit 306 Developing project management skills is an optional Level 3 unit covering the project lifecycle, roles, tools, risk and quality management, then applying them to a real project. Criterion 4.5 requires you to contribute to monitoring a budget, so check you have budget access before choosing it.

Level

RQF Level 3

Credit value

5 credits

Guided learning

30 hrs

Assessment criteria

15 criteria

Learning outcomes and assessment criteria

To achieve unit 306 your portfolio must evidence every assessment criterion below. There is no exam and no written assignment — you demonstrate each criterion using evidence from your own work.

Learning outcome 1

Understand the project lifecycle and roles and responsibilities within a project

  • 1.1

    Explain the key stages in the lifecycle of a project

    What this covers: Key stages: initiation, planning, execution, monitoring and control, closure and evaluation.

  • 1.2

    Summarise the key roles and responsibilities in a project team

Learning outcome 2

Understand how to deliver a project against targets

  • 2.1

    Describe project management tools and their application

    What this covers: Project management tools: business case, project initiation document (PID), PESTLE, SWOT, work breakdown structures (WBS), PERT diagrams, SMART objectives, Gantt charts, plan on a page, communication plan, RACI matrix.

  • 2.2

    Explain how to manage resources within a project

    What this covers: Resources: people, technology, equipment, budget, time.

  • 2.3

    Describe the risks and issues within a project and how they can impact project outcomes

    What this covers: Risks and issues: scope, time, cost, quality, resources.

  • 2.4

    Describe different risk analysis tools/techniques used within a project

    What this covers: Risk analysis tools/techniques: SWOT analysis, risk log/register, Fishbone/Ishikawa, RAG rating, risk matrix, brainstorming, 5 whys, checklists, assumption analysis, cause and effect diagrams, affinity diagram.

  • 2.5

    Explain how to use project management tools to monitor progress and performance of a project

    What this covers: Project management tools: work breakdown structures (WBS), PERT diagrams, SMART objectives, Gantt charts.

Learning outcome 3

Understand quality management within a project

  • 3.1

    Define 'project quality management'

  • 3.2

    Describe different project quality management approaches and their uses

    What this covers: Approaches: total quality management (TQM), Six Sigma, lean management, ISO Standards, agile methodology.

Learning outcome 4

Be able to contribute to delivering a project against targets

  • 4.1

    Apply project management tools to deliver a project against targets

    Evidence requirement: Evidence must include at least two different project management tools applied from any of the following: business case, project charter, project initiation document (PID), PESTLE, SWOT, work breakdown structures (WBS), PERT diagrams, SMART objectives, Gantt charts, plan on a page, communication plan, RACI matrix, risks and issues log/register.

  • 4.2

    Use management tools to organise and manage resources to ensure milestones are achieved

    Evidence requirement: Evidence must include at least two examples.

  • 4.3

    Identify risks and issues

    Evidence requirement: Evidence must include at least two identified risks and issues.

    What this covers: Risks and issues may be at any stage or part of the project and may include but not be limited to: performance, scope, quality, financial or technological.

  • 4.4

    Monitor progress and performance against targets

    Evidence requirement: Evidence should include at least two examples of monitoring.

  • 4.5

    Contribute to the monitoring of a budget within a project

  • 4.6

    Contribute to the evaluation of a project

How to approach unit 306

Written by our assessment team: what the criteria mean in practice, the evidence that works, and where learners get caught out.

What this unit is really about

Unit 306 is a four-outcome unit where the knowledge is broad but the practical part is bounded: LO4 asks you to contribute to delivering a project against targets, not to run a programme. "Contribute to" is deliberate — you can evidence this as a project team member or workstream lead, not only as the project manager.

Two constraints to check before you choose it. Criterion 4.5 requires you to contribute to the monitoring of a budget within a project, so you need visibility of some financial figure. And criterion 4.6 requires you to contribute to the evaluation of a project, which means it has to finish — or at least reach a reviewable milestone — inside your enrolment.

The evidence that works

Learning outcomeEvidence that works well
LO1 — lifecycle and rolesThe lifecycle stages as your organisation runs them, plus the roles named in the spec guidance: project board member, sponsor, project manager, team lead, team member, subject matter experts, administrator
LO2 — deliver against targetsTools and their application, resource management, risks and issues, risk analysis techniques, and how tools are used to monitor progress
LO3 — quality managementA definition of project quality management and the approaches your sector uses
LO4 — contribute to deliveryThe actual artefacts: plan or Gantt chart, RAID or risk log, milestone tracking, budget monitoring you contributed to, and the closing review

The strongest 306 portfolios are mostly artefacts with short commentaries. A Gantt chart with your annotations of where it slipped and what you did evidences 4.1 and 4.4 in a page. A risk register with dates showing when each risk was raised, scored and mitigated evidences 4.3 far better than prose describing risk in the abstract.

Getting risk and quality right

Criterion 2.4 asks for risk analysis tools and techniques, so name and use specific ones rather than talking generally about risk. Probability-and-impact scoring, a risk matrix, RAG rating, a RAID log, root-cause techniques such as five whys or a fishbone diagram all qualify — and the honest observation that your organisation scores risk by judgement rather than by formal probability is worth making if it is true.

For quality (LO3), distinguish the three things learners routinely merge: quality planning (what "good" means for this project, agreed up front), quality control (checking the output against it), and quality assurance (checking the process that produces it). If your sector works to a standard — ISO 9001, a client specification, a regulatory requirement — anchor the answer there.

Useful reading

Supporting information for unit 306

Unit aim: This unit equips learners with the knowledge and skills needed to support the planning, delivery, and monitoring of workplace projects. Learners will explore the project lifecycle, team roles, tools and techniques, and approaches to managing resources, risks, and quality.

Unit guidance: AC1.3 Key roles: project board member, project sponsor, project manager, project team lead, project team member, specialists/subject matter experts, project administrator.

Suggested learning resources: These suggestions are current at the time of publication. The following resources are provided as guidance only. Centres should select current and relevant resources and encourage learners in self-guided reading. Managing projects (ILM eWorkbook), City & Guilds/ILM ILM eWorkbooks ILM developing management skills: Workbook, BPP Learning Media AbeBooks UK

Evidencing this unit

All evidence for the skills learning outcomes must be generated in the workplace or a realistic working environment, and must be valid and attributable to you.

  • Workplace documentation and records — team development plans, project implementation reports, meeting agendas and minutes, training materials
  • Video clips, up to a maximum of 15 minutes
  • Projects
  • Reflective accounts, journals and logs
  • Assessment observation
  • Witness testimonies

Where unit 306 counts

This unit sits in the ILM Level 3 Leadership and Management suite (8723) and counts towards the pathways below, from £449.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need to be a project manager to do unit 306?

No. LO4 asks you to contribute to delivering a project against targets, so evidence as a workstream lead or project team member is acceptable — provided your contribution is attributable to you.

What if I have no access to the project budget?

Criterion 4.5 requires you to contribute to monitoring a budget within a project, so you need visibility of some financial figure — even a small equipment or resource line. Without it, another optional unit is a safer choice.

Is unit 306 mandatory?

Yes. Unit 306 is a mandatory unit — every learner on the relevant pathway must complete it.

How is unit 306 assessed?

Assessment is a portfolio of evidence, centre-devised and internally set and marked. There are no exams and no written assignments.

What evidence can I use for unit 306?

All evidence for the skills learning outcomes must be generated in the workplace or a realistic working environment, and must be valid and attributable to you. Workplace documents, projects, reflective accounts, observation records and witness testimonies are all valid sources.

Which qualifications include unit 306?

It counts towards the Level 3 Award, Level 3 Certificate, Level 3 Diploma, Level 3 Extended Diploma.