ILM explained

How ILM qualifications are assessed: portfolio, not exams

How assessment works on the current ILM by City & Guilds Level 3 and Level 5 qualifications: portfolio of evidence, centre-devised, internally marked, pass/fail — and what that means week to week.

9 min readLast reviewed
A learner organising portfolio evidence on a laptop

The most common question about ILM qualifications is whether there is an exam. There is not — and understanding what replaces it is the difference between finding the qualification straightforward and finding it baffling.

The short answer

The current ILM by City & Guilds Level 3 (8723) and Level 5 (8725) leadership and management qualifications are assessed by a portfolio of evidence.

  • Assessment is a portfolio of evidence, centre-devised and internally set and marked. There are no exams and no written assignments.
  • Grading is pass/fail against the assessment criteria. There are no percentages, merits or distinctions.
  • All evidence for the skills learning outcomes must be generated in the workplace or a realistic working environment, and must be valid and attributable to you.
  • Entry requirements: no formal entry requirements.

"Centre-devised, internally set and internally marked" means your approved centre designs the assessment approach, your assessor makes the judgements, an internal quality assurer samples and confirms them, and City & Guilds carries out external quality assurance of the centre.

What "portfolio of evidence" means in practice

A portfolio is a structured collection of evidence showing you meet every assessment criterion in the units you are taking. Each unit has learning outcomes; each learning outcome has assessment criteria; each criterion needs evidence.

The permitted evidence sources are set out in the handbooks:

  • Workplace documentation and records — team development plans, project implementation reports, meeting agendas and minutes, training materials
  • Video clips, up to a maximum of 15 minutes
  • Projects
  • Reflective accounts, journals and logs
  • Assessment observation
  • Witness testimonies

That list is not exhaustive — your centre may accept other sources — and the practical point is that most of it is work you are doing anyway. The team development plan, the project report, the meeting minutes, the training you delivered: those exist because the job required them. The portfolio work is selecting them, explaining your role, and adding the reflection that shows your reasoning.

The two tests every piece of evidence must pass

  1. Valid — it genuinely demonstrates the criterion. A meeting agenda proves a meeting was planned; it does not prove you handled a disagreement well.
  2. Attributable to you — it is demonstrably your own work. Your centre completes an attribution statement confirming this, and you support it by labelling what you did and, where useful, providing a witness testimony.

Everything else — how you organise it, paper or electronic, how long you take — is flexible. Learners may use a paper portfolio or an ePortfolio.

What the process actually looks like

1. Induction and planning. You agree which units you are taking (each pathway has mandatory and optional units), and your assessor helps you map likely evidence from your actual role. Done well, this is the single most valuable session in the whole qualification — it usually reveals that half the evidence already exists.

2. Gathering as you go. The efficient approach is to collect evidence when the activity happens, not to reconstruct it at the end. A folder, a running log, dated documents.

3. Reflection and write-up. Reflective accounts carry the analysis: why you chose that approach, what happened, what you would change. This is where higher-level criteria such as evaluate and justify are met, and it is the part that cannot be evidenced by a document alone.

4. Corroboration. Witness testimonies from managers and colleagues, assessor observation of live activity, and professional discussion.

5. Assessment feedback. Your assessor reviews evidence against criteria and tells you where there are gaps. This is iterative, not a verdict. "Not yet sufficient" is a normal stage, not a failure.

6. Internal and external quality assurance. Your centre samples and confirms decisions; City & Guilds quality assures the centre. Then the certificate is claimed.

What it says on your certificate

Your certificate carries the exact regulated qualification title. For Level 3 that is the City & Guilds Level 3 Award, Certificate, Diploma and Extended Diploma in Leadership and Management Skills suite, and for Level 5 the City & Guilds Level 5 Award, Certificate, Diploma and Extended Diploma in Operational Leadership and Management Skills suite. Publicly these are widely known as ILM qualifications, because ILM is the City & Guilds Group brand for leadership and management — see ILM vs City & Guilds if that naming is confusing.

Why portfolio assessment is harder and better than an exam

Harder, honestly:

  • You cannot revise your way through it the night before.
  • It requires you to actually do things at work, and to have a role where you can.
  • It requires organisation over months rather than intensity over days.
  • Writing reflectively about your own failures is uncomfortable.

Better, and this is the point:

  • Nothing is wasted. The work counts twice — once for the job, once for the qualification.
  • It proves capability rather than recall. An employer reading it knows you led a change, not that you passed a paper about change.
  • It changes practice. Applying a model and then evaluating it honestly is what actually makes someone a better manager.
  • There is no single high-stakes moment.

Common misconceptions

"I need to find assignment examples." No — the current suites have no assignments. That expectation comes from the legacy ILM 8600-series qualifications, which were assignment-based. See ILM assignments vs portfolio evidence.

"I'll write it all up at the end." Possible but far more work, and the evidence is weaker because you are reconstructing rather than recording.

"I can use a template from the internet." Templates for structure are fine. Content must be your own real workplace activity — model answers are not evidence, and an assessor's authenticity checks and the attribution statement exist precisely to catch this.

"Pass/fail means it's easy." It means there is no grade, not that the bar is low. Every criterion must be met.

Where to go next

Frequently asked questions

Is there an exam for ILM Level 3 or Level 5?

No. The current City & Guilds 8723 and 8725 leadership and management qualifications are assessed entirely by a portfolio of evidence. There are no exams and no written assignments, and grading is pass/fail against the assessment criteria.

Who marks an ILM portfolio?

Your centre. Assessment is centre-devised, internally set and internally marked by a qualified assessor, then internally quality assured. City & Guilds carries out external quality assurance of the centre's decisions.

How long does an ILM qualification take?

It depends on the size. An Award is the fastest route and an Extended Diploma the longest — the pathway pages list guided learning hours, total qualification time and typical duration for each. Most working managers complete a Certificate in six to nine months.

Can I fail an ILM qualification?

Grading is pass/fail against criteria, so a piece of evidence that does not meet a criterion simply is not yet sufficient. Your assessor tells you what is missing and you provide more evidence. It is a process of building sufficiency rather than a single pass-or-fail event.

Do I need to be in a management role?

In practice, yes. Evidence for the skills learning outcomes must be generated in the workplace or a realistic working environment, so you need a role where you can lead and manage. There are no formal entry requirements beyond that.

Explore the qualifications

Every pathway, unit, price and the exact title that appears on your certificate.

Not sure which level fits your role?

Tell us what you actually do at work and we will tell you which qualification your evidence will support — even if that means a smaller, cheaper one.